Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-05-02 15:10:38 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DA48161A553B9C327839C1F046371BBB545CD8A676E4C72B1FFCAE6EFE3D26A5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN the first CN ignores what the Report says, that evidence is sparse in both pro and contra- "GAC" because studies and evidence are weak. Instead of reading the Report itself, it links to a biased interpretation/reporting of the Executive summary in the Report

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1918282583697170904
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DA48161A553B9C327839C1F046371BBB545CD8A676E4C72B1FFCAE6EFE3D26A5
  • createdAtMillis - 1746198638899
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1918282583697170904DA48161A553B9C327839C1F046371BBB545CD8A676E4C72B1FFCAE6EFE3D26A5