Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-26 14:56:12 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F420F05F0AF3ABF89C5C7244D12D283FE5E7D1A1C593615CB3DE8C0E5FD74D24
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The original post makes clear the government alleges the judge broke the law. The poster opines that the judges conduct was not illegal. Saying the judge was charged is not additional context. Arguments about the basis of the charges are for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1915895792986165762
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F420F05F0AF3ABF89C5C7244D12D283FE5E7D1A1C593615CB3DE8C0E5FD74D24
  • createdAtMillis - 1745679372576
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1915895792986165762F420F05F0AF3ABF89C5C7244D12D283FE5E7D1A1C593615CB3DE8C0E5FD74D24