Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-25 22:54:07 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DFF131DA0ED956DAC3DC04B0DB0286EF9035C8A2D3EC9D23D77F5E2E17C21EB8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The original post makes clear the government alleges the judge broke the law. The poster opines that the judges conduct was not illegal. Saying the judge was charged is not additional context. Arguments about the basis of the charges are for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1915895792986165762
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DFF131DA0ED956DAC3DC04B0DB0286EF9035C8A2D3EC9D23D77F5E2E17C21EB8
  • createdAtMillis - 1745621647271
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1915895792986165762DFF131DA0ED956DAC3DC04B0DB0286EF9035C8A2D3EC9D23D77F5E2E17C21EB8