Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-25 22:29:07 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CB9F393A34638B9F828CD3CECBFEE70787CB694EE2C9530A30205A34DBE1B71B
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The original post makes clear the government alleges the judge broke the law. The poster opines that the judges conduct was not illegal. Saying the judge was charged is not additional context. Arguments about the basis of the charges are for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1915895792986165762
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CB9F393A34638B9F828CD3CECBFEE70787CB694EE2C9530A30205A34DBE1B71B
  • createdAtMillis - 1745620147260
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1915895792986165762CB9F393A34638B9F828CD3CECBFEE70787CB694EE2C9530A30205A34DBE1B71B