Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-26 16:02:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8FD2D4D72A7826F8803C0AD1955E7E8F02F2D56D2ADC80A9BD6740938B1BACA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The original post makes clear the government alleges the judge broke the law. The poster opines that the judges conduct was not illegal. Saying the judge was charged is not additional context. Arguments about the basis of the charges are for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1915895792986165762
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8FD2D4D72A7826F8803C0AD1955E7E8F02F2D56D2ADC80A9BD6740938B1BACA8
  • createdAtMillis - 1745683370069
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19158957929861657628FD2D4D72A7826F8803C0AD1955E7E8F02F2D56D2ADC80A9BD6740938B1BACA8