Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-26 07:53:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 788A6E7019484E28D4217DB7A354E29DA3C5D341BA5B9F8ECEFCF34C829C16DB
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - The original post makes clear the government alleges the judge broke the law. The poster opines that the judges conduct was not illegal. Saying the judge was charged is not additional context. Arguments about the basis of the charges are for the comments.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1915895792986165762
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 788A6E7019484E28D4217DB7A354E29DA3C5D341BA5B9F8ECEFCF34C829C16DB
  • createdAtMillis - 1745653986986
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1915895792986165762788A6E7019484E28D4217DB7A354E29DA3C5D341BA5B9F8ECEFCF34C829C16DB