Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-18 22:51:34 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F85A06038D77B06D8667080CCB3FEE057B01829F411D35C6D395DE6C3557DA08
Participant Details

Original Note:

“ The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that police have no specific obligation to protect.” And by extension govt in general. In contrast, the oath for POTUS calls to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution”. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/do-the-police-have-an-obligation-to-protect-you/#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20has,no%20specific%20obligation%20to%20protect. https://www.usa.gov/inauguration#:~:text=the%20U.S.%20Constitution%3A-,%22I%20do%20solemnly%20swear%20(or%20affirm)%20that%20I%20will,Constitution%20of%20the%20United%20States.%22

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1913307497168842881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F85A06038D77B06D8667080CCB3FEE057B01829F411D35C6D395DE6C3557DA08
  • createdAtMillis - 1745016694722
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1913307497168842881F85A06038D77B06D8667080CCB3FEE057B01829F411D35C6D395DE6C3557DA08