Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-19 01:33:13 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: DF95F894E680890BC9C9DCC59C0C25CF3A3320C29858A1027253C1990AE1E81E
Participant Details

Original Note:

“ The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that police have no specific obligation to protect.” And by extension govt in general. In contrast, the oath for POTUS calls to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution”. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/do-the-police-have-an-obligation-to-protect-you/#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20has,no%20specific%20obligation%20to%20protect. https://www.usa.gov/inauguration#:~:text=the%20U.S.%20Constitution%3A-,%22I%20do%20solemnly%20swear%20(or%20affirm)%20that%20I%20will,Constitution%20of%20the%20United%20States.%22

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1913307497168842881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - DF95F894E680890BC9C9DCC59C0C25CF3A3320C29858A1027253C1990AE1E81E
  • createdAtMillis - 1745026393865
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1913307497168842881DF95F894E680890BC9C9DCC59C0C25CF3A3320C29858A1027253C1990AE1E81E