Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-18 23:25:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9EE9D424A8F5D8BF160019A18D17B1383ED232FEB9914A159254C68AA7AF79E8
Participant Details

Original Note:

“ The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that police have no specific obligation to protect.” And by extension govt in general. In contrast, the oath for POTUS calls to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution”. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/do-the-police-have-an-obligation-to-protect-you/#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20has,no%20specific%20obligation%20to%20protect. https://www.usa.gov/inauguration#:~:text=the%20U.S.%20Constitution%3A-,%22I%20do%20solemnly%20swear%20(or%20affirm)%20that%20I%20will,Constitution%20of%20the%20United%20States.%22

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1913307497168842881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9EE9D424A8F5D8BF160019A18D17B1383ED232FEB9914A159254C68AA7AF79E8
  • createdAtMillis - 1745018747486
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19133074971688428819EE9D424A8F5D8BF160019A18D17B1383ED232FEB9914A159254C68AA7AF79E8