Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-19 19:07:06 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5BD2F10C3CF3E5F82D16353F70EA61FACD49B1FAC81ABD98096BDAF083BB3ECC
Participant Details

Original Note:

“ The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that police have no specific obligation to protect.” And by extension govt in general. In contrast, the oath for POTUS calls to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution”. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/do-the-police-have-an-obligation-to-protect-you/#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20has,no%20specific%20obligation%20to%20protect. https://www.usa.gov/inauguration#:~:text=the%20U.S.%20Constitution%3A-,%22I%20do%20solemnly%20swear%20(or%20affirm)%20that%20I%20will,Constitution%20of%20the%20United%20States.%22

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1913307497168842881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5BD2F10C3CF3E5F82D16353F70EA61FACD49B1FAC81ABD98096BDAF083BB3ECC
  • createdAtMillis - 1745089626964
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19133074971688428815BD2F10C3CF3E5F82D16353F70EA61FACD49B1FAC81ABD98096BDAF083BB3ECC