Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-18 19:09:16 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 1FD68C60EAE4515573548445F3C73B7B4B61BF8DC9D9911DC8D108FE00BD32D7
Participant Details

Original Note:

“ The U.S. Supreme Court has also ruled that police have no specific obligation to protect.” And by extension govt in general. In contrast, the oath for POTUS calls to “preserve, protect and defend the Constitution”. https://www.findlaw.com/legalblogs/law-and-life/do-the-police-have-an-obligation-to-protect-you/#:~:text=The%20U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%20has,no%20specific%20obligation%20to%20protect. https://www.usa.gov/inauguration#:~:text=the%20U.S.%20Constitution%3A-,%22I%20do%20solemnly%20swear%20(or%20affirm)%20that%20I%20will,Constitution%20of%20the%20United%20States.%22

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1913307497168842881
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 1FD68C60EAE4515573548445F3C73B7B4B61BF8DC9D9911DC8D108FE00BD32D7
  • createdAtMillis - 1745003356515
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19133074971688428811FD68C60EAE4515573548445F3C73B7B4B61BF8DC9D9911DC8D108FE00BD32D7