Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-18 08:34:48 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 81735B87378E27077DCF8B7E618BE902E309338C7C2A06E76F204D1DC3B696DE
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN - OP states that the Supreme Court did not hear from a single trans organisation, which is factually correct. No mention was made of individuals giving evidence to the court, and neither the EHRC nor Amnesty International are specifically trans rights organisations

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912793384638366134
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 81735B87378E27077DCF8B7E618BE902E309338C7C2A06E76F204D1DC3B696DE
  • createdAtMillis - 1744965288816
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 191279338463836613481735B87378E27077DCF8B7E618BE902E309338C7C2A06E76F204D1DC3B696DE