Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-18 06:49:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CDB3103AC052CD08076AD7FBC066354A13C762D1C976F6A5FD40C9AC1C01065E
Participant Details

Original Note:

The Supreme Court rarely hears - takes evidence from - individuals, as its role is to interpret the intent of the law as written. The court heard from groups advocating the trans position including the Equality and Human Rights Commission and Amnesty International. https://supremecourt.uk/cases/uksc-2024-0042

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912772652734833105
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CDB3103AC052CD08076AD7FBC066354A13C762D1C976F6A5FD40C9AC1C01065E
  • createdAtMillis - 1744958979060
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1912772652734833105CDB3103AC052CD08076AD7FBC066354A13C762D1C976F6A5FD40C9AC1C01065E