Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-16 20:14:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C0387EF46D25B76DF5099373A2655D963149F4DECDA2FF9C6DE59A29FACF2F4E
Participant Details

Original Note:

L’arrêt ne porte que sur le sens des termes “sexe” (sex), “homme” (man) et “femme” (woman) de l’“Equality Act” de 2010. Il n’a pas de portée générale et il n’établit aucune “définition légale” générale de la femme. https://supremecourt.uk/uploads/uksc_2024_0042_press_summary_8a42145662.pdf (avant dernier paragraphe)

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912545413271273649
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C0387EF46D25B76DF5099373A2655D963149F4DECDA2FF9C6DE59A29FACF2F4E
  • createdAtMillis - 1744834441512
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
  • ratingsId - 1912545413271273649C0387EF46D25B76DF5099373A2655D963149F4DECDA2FF9C6DE59A29FACF2F4E