Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-16 15:50:31 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F1A0318062748E093405129C45607EE380748D39F7745B6E67B924067C33C532
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN is interpreting this wrong, the posts claim is correct. The court based it's decision to define woman as biological born female on the Equality Act of 2010. CN implies it limits its definition to the Equality Act of 2010, which is wrong https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1912432172436271580

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912517772157796357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F1A0318062748E093405129C45607EE380748D39F7745B6E67B924067C33C532
  • createdAtMillis - 1744818631188
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1912517772157796357F1A0318062748E093405129C45607EE380748D39F7745B6E67B924067C33C532