Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-16 14:47:30 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: AC608DDC3F1EF3E50E614CD8B83270543A35F55BB8CD1F3E11BA140628B18F83
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN is interpreting this wrong, the posts claim is correct. The court based it's decision to define woman as biological born female on the Equality Act of 2010. CN implies it limits its definition to the Equality Act of 2010, which is wrong https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1912432172436271580

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912517772157796357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - AC608DDC3F1EF3E50E614CD8B83270543A35F55BB8CD1F3E11BA140628B18F83
  • createdAtMillis - 1744814850171
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1912517772157796357AC608DDC3F1EF3E50E614CD8B83270543A35F55BB8CD1F3E11BA140628B18F83