Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-16 16:38:49 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 8AD724B58347057D0E5CF89DEA11FC774BB0394045480198A61F329F933C64B1
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN is interpreting this wrong, the posts claim is correct. The court based it's decision to define woman as biological born female on the Equality Act of 2010. CN implies it limits its definition to the Equality Act of 2010, which is wrong https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1912432172436271580

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912517772157796357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 8AD724B58347057D0E5CF89DEA11FC774BB0394045480198A61F329F933C64B1
  • createdAtMillis - 1744821529990
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19125177721577963578AD724B58347057D0E5CF89DEA11FC774BB0394045480198A61F329F933C64B1