Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-16 17:36:57 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 3B31CC705D5D06980632D3F347DBC8C60F6866DE23A29B2147DE089745A31A20
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN is interpreting this wrong, the posts claim is correct. The court based it's decision to define woman as biological born female on the Equality Act of 2010. CN implies it limits its definition to the Equality Act of 2010, which is wrong https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1912432172436271580

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912517772157796357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 3B31CC705D5D06980632D3F347DBC8C60F6866DE23A29B2147DE089745A31A20
  • createdAtMillis - 1744825017539
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19125177721577963573B31CC705D5D06980632D3F347DBC8C60F6866DE23A29B2147DE089745A31A20