Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-16 15:26:08 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 05EB0976A1DCDEBDB069E9E4E0E563EA8441819A7C1F14A665D850B641ECD037
Participant Details

Original Note:

CN is interpreting this wrong, the posts claim is correct. The court based it's decision to define woman as biological born female on the Equality Act of 2010. CN implies it limits its definition to the Equality Act of 2010, which is wrong https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1912432172436271580

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912517772157796357
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 05EB0976A1DCDEBDB069E9E4E0E563EA8441819A7C1F14A665D850B641ECD037
  • createdAtMillis - 1744817168420
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 191251777215779635705EB0976A1DCDEBDB069E9E4E0E563EA8441819A7C1F14A665D850B641ECD037