Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-16 18:13:33 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: E11C9C9F3EAAB8DAEAE75A7BD583E3C28115F8E5DF5EBA766A0CED72E3BD2672
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN L'article de bfm cité indique que ce que la note fait passer pour vrai est sujet aux mêmes réserves que le chiffre avancé par Mme Tondelier. Utilisez les commentaires, pas les CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912437901440221412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - E11C9C9F3EAAB8DAEAE75A7BD583E3C28115F8E5DF5EBA766A0CED72E3BD2672
  • createdAtMillis - 1744827213631
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1912437901440221412E11C9C9F3EAAB8DAEAE75A7BD583E3C28115F8E5DF5EBA766A0CED72E3BD2672