Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-16 13:27:29 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BF4E3405D15EB634A86B4BF7EAA1CCB0CEAFF3FB4115BCA97030482ACA871AD5
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN L'article de bfm cité indique que ce que la note fait passer pour vrai est sujet aux mêmes réserves que le chiffre avancé par Mme Tondelier. Utilisez les commentaires, pas les CN.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1912437901440221412
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BF4E3405D15EB634A86B4BF7EAA1CCB0CEAFF3FB4115BCA97030482ACA871AD5
  • createdAtMillis - 1744810049030
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1912437901440221412BF4E3405D15EB634A86B4BF7EAA1CCB0CEAFF3FB4115BCA97030482ACA871AD5