Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-12 13:24:04 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: CECF34900A4DE0CB469E6AAF4939A27100B38D4A73636A24552C6C92BFD2CFA0
Participant Details

Original Note:

There was a Reuters story on the subject that appears to have been deleted.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1910854031339356467
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - CECF34900A4DE0CB469E6AAF4939A27100B38D4A73636A24552C6C92BFD2CFA0
  • createdAtMillis - 1744464244512
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 1
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1910854031339356467CECF34900A4DE0CB469E6AAF4939A27100B38D4A73636A24552C6C92BFD2CFA0