Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-31 16:38:11 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: FB814F09C709D93115F8FF757C92BD2FB5A969BB7069A4034A0A3E748FA7B48D
Participant Details

Original Note:

No hay más volver a ver sus declaraciones para ver que pide, literalmente, que la presunción de inocencia no sirva ante la declaración de una mujer. La recogida de cable es antológica pero no cuela. https://x.com/antoniornaranjo/status/1906064098359669225?s=46&t=baxKW_KMoGwZYo30Cx1R1Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1906692221513982187
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - FB814F09C709D93115F8FF757C92BD2FB5A969BB7069A4034A0A3E748FA7B48D
  • createdAtMillis - 1743439091402
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1906692221513982187FB814F09C709D93115F8FF757C92BD2FB5A969BB7069A4034A0A3E748FA7B48D