Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-31 15:03:40 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: A36D058B96212C86C94601E0E87C4812B5D7233D33430DD05331E4D100282922
Participant Details

Original Note:

No hay más volver a ver sus declaraciones para ver que pide, literalmente, que la presunción de inocencia no sirva ante la declaración de una mujer. La recogida de cable es antológica pero no cuela. https://x.com/antoniornaranjo/status/1906064098359669225?s=46&t=baxKW_KMoGwZYo30Cx1R1Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1906692221513982187
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - A36D058B96212C86C94601E0E87C4812B5D7233D33430DD05331E4D100282922
  • createdAtMillis - 1743433420978
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1906692221513982187A36D058B96212C86C94601E0E87C4812B5D7233D33430DD05331E4D100282922