Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-02 10:30:50 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 9B27F264E407AD7775D5EF085D2D2019A4743963166EB603E028E2F08C665EA8
Participant Details

Original Note:

No hay más volver a ver sus declaraciones para ver que pide, literalmente, que la presunción de inocencia no sirva ante la declaración de una mujer. La recogida de cable es antológica pero no cuela. https://x.com/antoniornaranjo/status/1906064098359669225?s=46&t=baxKW_KMoGwZYo30Cx1R1Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1906692221513982187
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 9B27F264E407AD7775D5EF085D2D2019A4743963166EB603E028E2F08C665EA8
  • createdAtMillis - 1743589850372
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19066922215139821879B27F264E407AD7775D5EF085D2D2019A4743963166EB603E028E2F08C665EA8