Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-31 20:21:59 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 57FD07A8024845590D92C6B7E400C10294BAC8518D2DA78393F2D66D39D2122F
Participant Details

Original Note:

No hay más volver a ver sus declaraciones para ver que pide, literalmente, que la presunción de inocencia no sirva ante la declaración de una mujer. La recogida de cable es antológica pero no cuela. https://x.com/antoniornaranjo/status/1906064098359669225?s=46&t=baxKW_KMoGwZYo30Cx1R1Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1906692221513982187
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 57FD07A8024845590D92C6B7E400C10294BAC8518D2DA78393F2D66D39D2122F
  • createdAtMillis - 1743452519118
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 190669222151398218757FD07A8024845590D92C6B7E400C10294BAC8518D2DA78393F2D66D39D2122F