Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-04-02 05:12:37 UTC - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0174FBA4B7A9A86AE1E617C1E7D4C371230A00D6F6007E4CF8726D0809F0F00D
Participant Details

Original Note:

No hay más volver a ver sus declaraciones para ver que pide, literalmente, que la presunción de inocencia no sirva ante la declaración de una mujer. La recogida de cable es antológica pero no cuela. https://x.com/antoniornaranjo/status/1906064098359669225?s=46&t=baxKW_KMoGwZYo30Cx1R1Q

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1906692221513982187
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 0174FBA4B7A9A86AE1E617C1E7D4C371230A00D6F6007E4CF8726D0809F0F00D
  • createdAtMillis - 1743570757637
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - SOMEWHAT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19066922215139821870174FBA4B7A9A86AE1E617C1E7D4C371230A00D6F6007E4CF8726D0809F0F00D