Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-31 07:17:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F0288F8492E3D18337E6B7E95EB5E9441648C4B936B3C56D1EFB59BD07B7794C
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- proposed note is irrelevant. Walz makes no comment on the function of DOGE, but expresses his opinion about their impact. Using a political action committee as a source also comes off as exceptionally biased. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/examples

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1906544336688251321
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F0288F8492E3D18337E6B7E95EB5E9441648C4B936B3C56D1EFB59BD07B7794C
  • createdAtMillis - 1743405475241
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1906544336688251321F0288F8492E3D18337E6B7E95EB5E9441648C4B936B3C56D1EFB59BD07B7794C