Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-29 15:51:30 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5D0338DC079335833C8B5A2296CD1A8FB4F08CE96411163F2B9CC93E42A50C2B
Participant Details

Original Note:

It’s not false. and NNN. And the previous note about “native variety” seems to have thought the patients were allergic to a minority variety which is not true. The study makes a conclusion about patients where olive trees are *abundant*.

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1906000331009298906
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 5D0338DC079335833C8B5A2296CD1A8FB4F08CE96411163F2B9CC93E42A50C2B
  • createdAtMillis - 1743263490199
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19060003310092989065D0338DC079335833C8B5A2296CD1A8FB4F08CE96411163F2B9CC93E42A50C2B