Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-28 15:10:06 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 5B4D1019907EC8B9C5BC5423CDF146D052E85B6D2D039CD501B7B70CE1C5D046
Participant Details

Original Note:

La sentencia señala que "Contrastando la versión de la denunciante con lo registrado en las cámaras de seguridad podemos concluir que no coinciden estas versiones" (las del testimonio de la denunciante). https://web.archive.org/web/20240225080042/https://www.newtral.es/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/SECCIO-21-AP-BARCELONA.-sentencia-cas-Alves.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1905610089148322212
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 5B4D1019907EC8B9C5BC5423CDF146D052E85B6D2D039CD501B7B70CE1C5D046
createdAtMillis - 1743174606736
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 19056100891483222125B4D1019907EC8B9C5BC5423CDF146D052E85B6D2D039CD501B7B70CE1C5D046