Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-28 16:15:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 464002E02161111F81717F0A72FCD22F368455DA276B4B5A38CAB2B78AB50DFF
Participant Details

Original Note:

La sentencia señala que "Contrastando la versión de la denunciante con lo registrado en las cámaras de seguridad podemos concluir que no coinciden estas versiones" (las del testimonio de la denunciante). https://web.archive.org/web/20240225080042/https://www.newtral.es/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/SECCIO-21-AP-BARCELONA.-sentencia-cas-Alves.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1905610089148322212
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 464002E02161111F81717F0A72FCD22F368455DA276B4B5A38CAB2B78AB50DFF
createdAtMillis - 1743178551117
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1905610089148322212464002E02161111F81717F0A72FCD22F368455DA276B4B5A38CAB2B78AB50DFF