Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-28 22:18:01 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 370B2FEE795FF6C3BE12E66586266A60E457427842A61FB8246E0B01D5615FC3
Participant Details

Original Note:

La sentencia señala que "Contrastando la versión de la denunciante con lo registrado en las cámaras de seguridad podemos concluir que no coinciden estas versiones" (las del testimonio de la denunciante). https://web.archive.org/web/20240225080042/https://www.newtral.es/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/SECCIO-21-AP-BARCELONA.-sentencia-cas-Alves.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1905610089148322212
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 370B2FEE795FF6C3BE12E66586266A60E457427842A61FB8246E0B01D5615FC3
createdAtMillis - 1743200281651
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 1
notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 1
ratingsId - 1905610089148322212370B2FEE795FF6C3BE12E66586266A60E457427842A61FB8246E0B01D5615FC3