Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-29 08:14:59 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 0BF58CFD31CB3D804CF53DEDCA019753010ACFA386D40EC13E2B33AC5A4AFF89
Participant Details

Original Note:

La sentencia señala que "Contrastando la versión de la denunciante con lo registrado en las cámaras de seguridad podemos concluir que no coinciden estas versiones" (las del testimonio de la denunciante). https://web.archive.org/web/20240225080042/https://www.newtral.es/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/SECCIO-21-AP-BARCELONA.-sentencia-cas-Alves.pdf

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1905610089148322212
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 0BF58CFD31CB3D804CF53DEDCA019753010ACFA386D40EC13E2B33AC5A4AFF89
createdAtMillis - 1743236099877
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 0
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 19056100891483222120BF58CFD31CB3D804CF53DEDCA019753010ACFA386D40EC13E2B33AC5A4AFF89