Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-28 17:41:19 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 876426EE42957ADDECCF9AD1D942E5E865BAFBA9B5E1E9F908BA8D97D7E3262A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dredging up a two-year-old lawsuit with no relevance to the participants of this interview or the matter at hand is not only patently fallacious, but also reeks of a laughably desperate, feeble attempt to deflect and distract through irrational mud-slinging. https://practicalpie.com/ad-hominem-fallacy/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1905529873403109380
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 876426EE42957ADDECCF9AD1D942E5E865BAFBA9B5E1E9F908BA8D97D7E3262A
createdAtMillis - 1743183679666
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 0
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
helpfulImportantContext - 0
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 1905529873403109380876426EE42957ADDECCF9AD1D942E5E865BAFBA9B5E1E9F908BA8D97D7E3262A