Birdwatch Archive - Rating Details

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-28 17:16:47 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 85ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A
Participant Details

Original Note:

Dredging up a two-year-old lawsuit with no relevance to the participants of this interview or the matter at hand is not only patently fallacious, but also reeks of a laughably desperate, feeble attempt to deflect and distract through irrational mud-slinging. https://practicalpie.com/ad-hominem-fallacy/?utm_source=chatgpt.com

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

noteId - 1905529873403109380
participantId -
raterParticipantId - 85ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A
createdAtMillis - 1743182207245
version - 2
agree - 0
disagree - 0
helpful - 0
notHelpful - 0
helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
helpfulOther - 0
helpfulInformative - 0
helpfulClear - 1
helpfulEmpathetic - 0
helpfulGoodSources - 1
helpfulUniqueContext - 0
helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
helpfulImportantContext - 1
helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
notHelpfulOther - 0
notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
notHelpfulOutdated - 0
notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
ratingsId - 190552987340310938085ABC4BA2E4B984474E0827E33BEFF4B2540A6CCCA53F7792D15E256614AE43A