Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-27 21:04:51 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 2CB0DE5E09EBDC87CA688BFD6D4558DEAA4D84CF47D75169A303885370E35E3F
Participant Details

Original Note:

There is little proof one way or the other in that although there are many studies the studies contradict each other so in my opinion the original post is inconclusive. The community note although correct in its objection does not provide the necessary proof to counter the post https://x.com/i/grok/share/WH9ezs8iLM2ZaNaEuAMXSuJzn

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1905361669964136626
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 2CB0DE5E09EBDC87CA688BFD6D4558DEAA4D84CF47D75169A303885370E35E3F
  • createdAtMillis - 1743109491210
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19053616699641366262CB0DE5E09EBDC87CA688BFD6D4558DEAA4D84CF47D75169A303885370E35E3F