Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-28 04:37:51 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F526DEF0CDD436AE12C7C781AB8C7DEBCDCB0BB3C3B9F32BDFDF04B43B87F273
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes claim that "Machine learning" and "AI" used for generative purposes to show a character moving being used in Miyazaki's line of work (Animated film) is not AI art as a basis for their corrections. That is however, by common definition, AI art. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_art

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1905240242258333956
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F526DEF0CDD436AE12C7C781AB8C7DEBCDCB0BB3C3B9F32BDFDF04B43B87F273
  • createdAtMillis - 1743136671336
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1905240242258333956F526DEF0CDD436AE12C7C781AB8C7DEBCDCB0BB3C3B9F32BDFDF04B43B87F273