Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-27 15:32:28 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C71CAB078FAC38FC31C342A3637C9B8FB4A4D0435D4F635B9DF3FCD0D25E7742
Participant Details

Original Note:

The proposed notes claim that "Machine learning" and "AI" used for generative purposes to show a character moving being used in Miyazaki's line of work (Animated film) is not AI art as a basis for their corrections. That is however, by common definition, AI art. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence_art

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1905240242258333956
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C71CAB078FAC38FC31C342A3637C9B8FB4A4D0435D4F635B9DF3FCD0D25E7742
  • createdAtMillis - 1743089548708
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 1
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 1
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1905240242258333956C71CAB078FAC38FC31C342A3637C9B8FB4A4D0435D4F635B9DF3FCD0D25E7742