Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-25 14:11:24 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 48F67A520C432C3F7BAB3E40C2702A1A76D7539A5ABC662ACB56CB9C9CECB2E4
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN- How is every CN going to reference the very article that the tweet is disputing as a valid reference? It’s a circular dependency that assumes the article is true and factual and treats the article as gold

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1904525743301836933
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 48F67A520C432C3F7BAB3E40C2702A1A76D7539A5ABC662ACB56CB9C9CECB2E4
  • createdAtMillis - 1742911884213
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 1
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 1
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 190452574330183693348F67A520C432C3F7BAB3E40C2702A1A76D7539A5ABC662ACB56CB9C9CECB2E4