Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-25 07:19:58 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: C4ACFF337B4A279D9ACE4E3E48C01DF3663B20558CE46F50C67E44500F27A304
Participant Details

Original Note:

El usuario no desinforma pues no incurre en errores factuales y las fuentes de la nota propuesta lo demuestran más que refutarlo. Lo demás es opinión personal y va en comentarios. Irrelevante + opinión + NNN

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1904388627972465085
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - C4ACFF337B4A279D9ACE4E3E48C01DF3663B20558CE46F50C67E44500F27A304
  • createdAtMillis - 1742887198170
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1904388627972465085C4ACFF337B4A279D9ACE4E3E48C01DF3663B20558CE46F50C67E44500F27A304