Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-20 17:54:19 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 15D49F6E9AEC1FCD47D631698519E1A2224F1AA93966ACE80B72F40E2F2800B0
Participant Details

Original Note:

It seems that without hard evidence from a verifiable source, it’s safer to call this unproven at best, dubious at worst. https://x.com/i/grok/share/ruk6VRMy6lXN3aNyZR6WWBMEy

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1902564158156972235
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 15D49F6E9AEC1FCD47D631698519E1A2224F1AA93966ACE80B72F40E2F2800B0
  • createdAtMillis - 1742493259379
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 190256415815697223515D49F6E9AEC1FCD47D631698519E1A2224F1AA93966ACE80B72F40E2F2800B0