Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-18 14:11:39 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: D428CBD3FB6374D38E84AD2B74E3EB94ACA87A9FDE9CD4166E5B0EDFFDAD53B4
Participant Details

Original Note:

The referenced 2005 DoJ decision concludes that autopen is legally valid for bills under Article I, Sec 7 of the Constitution, and does not address the requirements for signing presidential pardons under Article II, Sec 2. Thus, having no bearing on the question at hand. https://www.justice.gov/olc/opinion/whether-president-may-sign-bill-directing-his-signature-be-affixed-it

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1901797017635938604
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - D428CBD3FB6374D38E84AD2B74E3EB94ACA87A9FDE9CD4166E5B0EDFFDAD53B4
  • createdAtMillis - 1742307099584
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1901797017635938604D428CBD3FB6374D38E84AD2B74E3EB94ACA87A9FDE9CD4166E5B0EDFFDAD53B4