Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-17 17:21:02 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: BBF6F3BE868B539CD23D5DDBE46F28E73B04D892D2DF3AB37DA4CD146A87C797
Participant Details

Original Note:

Article exaggerates from a slippery-slope fallacy. UM study does NOT recom a ban on homegrown food. It DOES allege that urban gardening has a carbon footprint 6x conventional agriculture and DOES recom inner cities use (expensive) greenhouses. Original study: https://www.nature.com/articles/s44284-023-00023-3 UM report: https://record.umich.edu/articles/study-examines-carbon-footprint-of-urban-farmed-food/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1901657962143166851
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - BBF6F3BE868B539CD23D5DDBE46F28E73B04D892D2DF3AB37DA4CD146A87C797
  • createdAtMillis - 1742232062971
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1901657962143166851BBF6F3BE868B539CD23D5DDBE46F28E73B04D892D2DF3AB37DA4CD146A87C797