Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-17 00:29:13 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: F959A41604277A615F34CD6FC62CA21ECE63AE7EBCCF508AA63CD7C9A05E4A29
Participant Details

Original Note:

Esses números da PMERJ são enganosos. O Monitor do Debate Público do Cebrap, calculou 16,2 mil pessoas is.gd/a8vH49 O Monitor do Debate Político no Meio Digital da USP, estimou 18,3 mil pessoas is.gd/k6zz17 Esse contraste gritante da cifra da PM mostra uma análise completamente desalinhada e irreal

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1901323247360057445
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - F959A41604277A615F34CD6FC62CA21ECE63AE7EBCCF508AA63CD7C9A05E4A29
  • createdAtMillis - 1742171353877
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 1
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1901323247360057445F959A41604277A615F34CD6FC62CA21ECE63AE7EBCCF508AA63CD7C9A05E4A29