Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-16 19:49:17 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 4B6DD624B1EB7A2BFACA94BFB69E44ABF943A2B5648CE97CCA64AB3AF0741274
Participant Details

Original Note:

Esses números da PMERJ são enganosos. O Monitor do Debate Público do Cebrap, calculou 16,2 mil pessoas is.gd/a8vH49 O Monitor do Debate Político no Meio Digital da USP, estimou 18,3 mil pessoas is.gd/k6zz17 Esse contraste gritante da cifra da PM mostra uma análise completamente desalinhada e irreal

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1901323247360057445
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 4B6DD624B1EB7A2BFACA94BFB69E44ABF943A2B5648CE97CCA64AB3AF0741274
  • createdAtMillis - 1742154557464
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 19013232473600574454B6DD624B1EB7A2BFACA94BFB69E44ABF943A2B5648CE97CCA64AB3AF0741274