Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-14 17:23:30 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 637EC4DC4A18A55EB8658A00D1698D9F1A7C32FAFCC1643557F7979A1B5E4E02
Participant Details

Original Note:

医師がわいせつ行為を行った、との誤解をまねく見出しです。 判決では「胸を舐めたことにより唾液が付着したとは認められない」と、わいせつ行為の証拠を否定しています。 https://news.tv-asahi.co.jp/news_society/articles/000410670.html?display=full

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1899756649415598356
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 637EC4DC4A18A55EB8658A00D1698D9F1A7C32FAFCC1643557F7979A1B5E4E02
  • createdAtMillis - 1741973010158
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1899756649415598356637EC4DC4A18A55EB8658A00D1698D9F1A7C32FAFCC1643557F7979A1B5E4E02