Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-09 08:44:12 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 951C1C5ED0274438DBECB5AB91D97F1DEB85D0DC24DCB561B7363D242FFF7A8D
Participant Details

Original Note:

La décision de justice mise en cause se fonde sur les incohérences dans les déclarations de la plaignante conduisant la procureure à demander l'abandon des charges et le parquet à ne pas faire appel. Aucune protection donc, la justice ne maintient pas des charges mensongères. https://lofficine.eu/temoignage/relaxe-suite-et-fin/

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1898469803301499119
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 951C1C5ED0274438DBECB5AB91D97F1DEB85D0DC24DCB561B7363D242FFF7A8D
  • createdAtMillis - 1741509852819
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 1
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1898469803301499119951C1C5ED0274438DBECB5AB91D97F1DEB85D0DC24DCB561B7363D242FFF7A8D