Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-08 21:41:52 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 882D2DE413AFDAF01FCA7B565B3582E528349CDACD49E18054A8B3AFD862E2FD
Participant Details

Original Note:

NNN: The follow-up post contains additional reference material about the story. The fact that a person unaffiliated with the research project merely noticed that photographs appeared manipulated and completely decimated the entire cancer institute is entirely correct. https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-00202-9

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1898427947519988170
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 882D2DE413AFDAF01FCA7B565B3582E528349CDACD49E18054A8B3AFD862E2FD
  • createdAtMillis - 1741470112098
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 1
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1898427947519988170882D2DE413AFDAF01FCA7B565B3582E528349CDACD49E18054A8B3AFD862E2FD