Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-03 11:04:55 UTC - NOT_HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 950BF506BA674357FA33DEE04FCF5E7E64F6F60B20CF33171C5FB3A0EED98624
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note contradicts itself. It first denies a pre/post-surgery comparison but then confirms comparing individuals who had and had not undergone surgery. This suggests the study does assess post-surgery outcomes, undermining the claim it doesn't. What the FUCK!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1896287764506886289
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 950BF506BA674357FA33DEE04FCF5E7E64F6F60B20CF33171C5FB3A0EED98624
  • createdAtMillis - 1740999895246
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - NOT_HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 0
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 0
  • helpfulImportantContext - 0
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 0
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 1
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 1
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 1896287764506886289950BF506BA674357FA33DEE04FCF5E7E64F6F60B20CF33171C5FB3A0EED98624