Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note Rating

2025-03-03 19:30:18 UTC - HELPFUL

Rated by Participant: 71CADB1DB9FE8FFFE4E7DABA702F092E3C51CE7DF56187F5E407F6CDD2D1B693
Participant Details

Original Note:

The note contradicts itself. It first denies a pre/post-surgery comparison but then confirms comparing individuals who had and had not undergone surgery. This suggests the study does assess post-surgery outcomes, undermining the claim it doesn't. What the FUCK!

All Note Details

Original Tweet

All Information

  • noteId - 1896287764506886289
  • participantId -
  • raterParticipantId - 71CADB1DB9FE8FFFE4E7DABA702F092E3C51CE7DF56187F5E407F6CDD2D1B693
  • createdAtMillis - 1741030218294
  • version - 2
  • agree - 0
  • disagree - 0
  • helpful - 0
  • notHelpful - 0
  • helpfulnessLevel - HELPFUL
  • helpfulOther - 0
  • helpfulInformative - 0
  • helpfulClear - 1
  • helpfulEmpathetic - 0
  • helpfulGoodSources - 0
  • helpfulUniqueContext - 0
  • helpfulAddressesClaim - 1
  • helpfulImportantContext - 1
  • helpfulUnbiasedLanguage - 1
  • notHelpfulOther - 0
  • notHelpfulIncorrect - 0
  • notHelpfulSourcesMissingOrUnreliable - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculationOrBias - 0
  • notHelpfulMissingKeyPoints - 0
  • notHelpfulOutdated - 0
  • notHelpfulHardToUnderstand - 0
  • notHelpfulArgumentativeOrBiased - 0
  • notHelpfulOffTopic - 0
  • notHelpfulSpamHarassmentOrAbuse - 0
  • notHelpfulIrrelevantSources - 0
  • notHelpfulOpinionSpeculation - 0
  • notHelpfulNoteNotNeeded - 0
  • ratingsId - 189628776450688628971CADB1DB9FE8FFFE4E7DABA702F092E3C51CE7DF56187F5E407F6CDD2D1B693